Helping you build better relationships at work


Monthly Archive for June, 2007

Keep Your Employees Engaged, Firms Told

Source: People Management

Date: 29/06/2007

Keeping employees interested and engaged will help prevent high staff turnover, it has been claimed.

New research from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) found that only 35% of employees are actually engaged with their work.

“Our recent research clearly shows how much management practice affects people’s attitudes towards their work,” said Mike Emmott, CIPD employee relations adviser.

“With only three in ten employees engaged, many managers evidently aren’t doing enough to keep their staff interested.”

Emmot said staff engagement delivered ‘business value’ and organisations should do more to ‘drive up levels of engagement among the workforce’.

The theme of employee engagement was the subject of discussion at the CIPD’s Annual Talent Management, Recruitment and Retention Conference.

Managing Stress Risks at Work: HSE Management Standards

Source: CIPD
Date: 20 June 2007

5 Steps to Risk Assessment

Well-being Solutions
Employee well-being is an important critical success factor in the modern organisation. Corporate health and well-being programmes that include building relationships provide more than an attractive and workable employee benefit, they can actually be a profitable investment. The ill health of employees is a key detriment of long-term profitability and competitiveness.In 2001, the HSE published “Tackling work-related stress: A managers’ guide to improving and maintaining employee health and well-being” (HSE Books). These guidelines encourage managers to manage and minimise the health risks associated with stress by taking a stress risk assessment approach.  They advise managers to use the same five steps to assess stress risks as are used for other health and safety risks.  These five steps are:

  1. Identify the hazards
  2. Decide who might be harmed and how
  3. Evaluate the risks, by: Identifying what action you are already taking; Deciding whether it is enough; If it is not, deciding what more you need to do
  4. Record the significant findings of the assessment
  5. Review the assessment at appropriate intervals

Risk assessment and the Management Standards
HSE launched the Management Standards on 3rd November 2004.  The Standards cover six categories of work-related stress ‘hazards’:

  • Demands
  • Control
  • Support
  • Relationships
  • Role
  • Change

THE MANAGEMENT STANDARDS (HSE 2004) DEMANDS 
Includes issues like workload, work patterns, and the work environment

The standard is that:

  • Employees indicate that they are able to cope with the demands of their jobs; and
  • Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns.

What should be happening / states to be achieved:

  • The organization provides employees with adequate and achievable demands in relation to the agreed hours of work;
  • People’s skills and abilities are matched to the job demands;
  • Jobs are designed to be within the capabilities of employees; and
  • Employees’ concerns about their work environment are addressed.

CONTROL 
How much say the person has in the way they do their work

The standard is that:

  • Employees indicate that they are able to have a say about the way they do their work; and
  • Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns.

What should be happening / states to be achieved:

  • Where possible, employees have control over their pace of work;
  • Employees are encouraged to use their skills and initiative to do their work;
  • Where possible, employees are encouraged to develop new skills to help them undertake new and challenging pieces of work;
  • The organization encourages employees to develop their skills;
  • Employees have a say over when breaks can be taken; and
  • Employees are consulted over their work patterns.

SUPPORT 
Includes the encouragement, sponsorship and resources provided by the organization, line management and colleagues

The standard is that:

  • Employees indicate that they receive adequate information and support from their colleagues and superiors; and
  • Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns.

What should be happening / states to be achieved:

  • The organization has policies and procedures to adequately support employees;
  • Systems are in place to enable and encourage managers to support their staff;
  • Systems are in place to enable and encourage employees to support their colleagues;
  • Employees know what support is available and how and when to access it;
  • Employees know how to access the required resources to do their job; and
  • Employees receive regular and constructive feedback.

RELATIONSHIPS 
Includes promoting positive working to avoid conflict and dealing with unacceptable behaviour

The standard is that:

  • Employees indicate that they are not subjected to unacceptable behaviours, e.g. bullying at work; and
  • Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns.

What should be happening / states to be achieved:

  • The organization promotes positive behaviours at work to avoid conflict and ensure fairness;
  • Employees share information relevant to their work;
  • The organization has agreed policies and procedures to prevent or resolve unacceptable behaviour;
  • Systems are in place to enable and encourage managers to deal with unacceptable behaviour; and
  • Systems are in place to enable and encourage employees to report unacceptable behaviour.

ROLE 
Whether people understand their role within the organization and whether the organization ensures that the person does not have conflicting roles

The standard is that:

  • Employees indicate that they understand their role and responsibilities; and
  • Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns.

What should be happening / states to be achieved:

  • The organization ensures that, as far as possible, the different requirements it places upon employees are compatible;
  • The organization provides information to enable employees to understand their role and responsibilities;
  • The organization ensures that, as far as possible, the requirements it places upon employees are clear; and
  • Systems are in place to enable employees to raise concerns about any uncertainties or conflicts they have in their role and responsibilities.

CHANGE 
How organizational change (large or small) is managed and communicated in the organization

The standard is that:

  • Employees indicate that the organization engages them frequently when undergoing an organizational change; and
  • Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns.

What should be happening / states to be achieved:

  • The organization provides employees with timely information to enable them to understand the reasons for proposed changes;
  • The organization ensures adequate employee consultation on changes and provides opportunities for employees to influence proposals;
  • Employees are aware of the probable impact of any changes to their jobs. If necessary, employees are given training to support any changes in their jobs;
  • Employees are aware of timetables for changes;
  • Employees have access to relevant support during changes.

How will the Management Standards influence management practice?

Organisational action the main emphasis

The Management Standards are more about organizational action in terms of risk assessment and benchmarking than individual management action.  The model underlying the Standards is one of constant improvement.  HSE want employers to conduct organizational stress risk assessments using the Management Standards as a template, in order to establish a benchmark of how well the organization is doing at preventing and reducing stress at work.  Once a benchmark has been established, the employer should work to improve its performance over time.  The ultimate goal is to reach the standards set now by the best 20% of employers (measured in 2004).  HSE have developed tools and guidance to enable employers to conduct suitable and sufficient risk assessments.

Managing ongoing risks

However, the Management Standards will also have a significant impact on all managers, because they are the people on the ground who manage stress risks in an ongoing way, and it is managers who must implement improvements introduced as a result of carrying out risk assessments.  Notice that for each Standard, systems should be in place to respond to individual concerns.  In reality, it is likely to be managers that will be responding, because if individuals have concerns about stress at work, managers will need to work with them to make adjustments so that risk is reduced.  Managers can be trained to work proactively with teams to prevent stress at work, and to respond appropriately when stress-related problems occur, in order to reduce the risk of stress.  

For more information on the Standards, visit the HSE website: www.hse.gov.uk/stress

Discrimination Law Shake-up Announced

Source: Personnel Today

Date: 15/06/2007

The government has revealed a green paper that could bring about the ‘biggest ever shake-up of the laws underpinning diversity’, it has been claimed.

Earlier this week, the government announced its Discrimination Law Review (DLR), which is seeking views on proposals such as a Single Equality Bill, to simplify and improve existing legislation and modernise discrimination law.

Discrimination law is currently contained in nine major pieces of legislation, and this can act as a barrier to fairness, the government said.

The review is good news for businesses, said Sue Ashtiany, head of employment at law firm Nabarro, non-executive director of Channel 4 and commissioner for the Equal Opportunities Commission.

She said: “Businesses are looking for simplicity. Discrimination law is getting very complex, so this review is a good time to put forward their thoughts and make a case for streamlined work rather than legislation for the sake of it.

According to Ashtiany, businesses are going on a diversity drive, but she warned that lots of positive action measures are currently unlawful.

“Lots of companies now want to be able to take action to remove disadvantage but don’t know how to do it without breaking the law because there’s not much scope for legal positive action.

“For example, it is usually unlawful to favour women or ethnic minorities in recruitment promotion and job opportunities but that’s just what employers often want to do.

“In the DLR there are some interesting ideas being floated about letting such businesses do more without being at risk of litigation.

“So whether the concern is to avoid complicated and unnecessary claims or to ask for incentives for – say- agreeing flexible working, this is the opportunity to join in and tell the government what you want.”

Discrimination law shake-up announced

Source: Personnel Today
Date: 15/06/2007
The government has revealed a green paper that could bring about the ‘biggest ever shake-up of the laws underpinning diversity’, it has been claimed.
Earlier this week, the government announced its Discrimination Law Review (DLR), which is seeking views on proposals such as a Single Equality Bill, to simplify and improve existing legislation and modernise discrimination law.
Discrimination law is currently contained in nine major pieces of legislation, and this can act as a barrier to fairness, the government said.
The review is good news for businesses, said Sue Ashtiany, head of employment at law firm Nabarro, non-executive director of Channel 4 and commissioner for the Equal Opportunities Commission.
She said: “Businesses are looking for simplicity. Discrimination law is getting very complex, so this review is a good time to put forward their thoughts and make a case for streamlined work rather than legislation for the sake of it.
According to Ashtiany, businesses are going on a diversity drive, but she warned that lots of positive action measures are currently unlawful.
“Lots of companies now want to be able to take action to remove disadvantage but don’t know how to do it without breaking the law because there’s not much scope for legal positive action.
“For example, it is usually unlawful to favour women or ethnic minorities in recruitment promotion and job opportunities but that’s just what employers often want to do.
“In the DLR there are some interesting ideas being floated about letting such businesses do more without being at risk of litigation.
“So whether the concern is to avoid complicated and unnecessary claims or to ask for incentives for – say- agreeing flexible working, this is the opportunity to join in and tell the government what you want.”

Managers Key to Reducing Cost of Stress

Source: Personnel Today

Date: 13/06/2007

Managers could significantly lower a £5bn drain on business, it has been claimed, by learning to recognise when employees are under stress.

According to Canada Life Group Insurance, workplace bullying or harassment is the most obvious cause of work-related stress, but there are numerous other more subtle triggers, such as workloads, management, organisational change and targets.

Colin Micklewright, head of group income protection development at Canada Life Group Insurance commented: “Before any action can be taken to help employees suffering from stress, it is important to identify who is suffering and why.

“Often there are many signs that a person is suffering from workplace stress, but if you are not watching for these behaviours, you may miss them.”

Clive Lewis of Globis encourages employers to be on the lookout for classic signs of employee stress, such as workers acting unduly quiet, working extended hours, procrastinating or reacting in an irritable manner.

He added: “It is important for organisations to be aware of potential causes of stress and work to actively avoid them.

“Prevention really is better than cure as returning a person to work after a period of absence due to stress without acknowledging the causes and working to change them, can be a pointless exercise.

CIPD Welcomes Brown’s Workplace Agenda Proposals

Source: CIPD

Date: 12/07/2007

Gordon Brown’s workplace agenda has been given the thumbs up by recruitment professionals, following the publication of the government’s draft legislative programme.

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) said it particularly welcomed the education and skills, employment simplification and pensions bills.

“Many of the proposals contained within the education and skills bill are aimed at giving young people and lower-skilled employees access to training,” said Martyn Sloman, CIPD skills advisor.

Sloman praised the bill’s focus on encouraging employers to allow young people to train, but said this duty should lay at the feet of bosses rather than HR professionals.

Ben Willmott, CIPD employee relations advisor said he was delighted the government was scrapping the statutory resolution procedures as part of the employment simplification bill.

According to research by the organisation, 29% of employers feel disputes are less likely to be resolved informally following the 2004 introduction of the statutory dispute resolution procedures.

“[The procedures] have done little to improve the dispute resolutions process, and actually made things worse,” said Willmott.

The CIPD also suggested that many of the proposals outlined in the pensions bill would improve pension schemes without harming employers or existing arrangements.




T:0800 3457703